Civil rights, not separatism – or convenience in daily life?

In the wake of the Israeli elections last week, here are some excerpts from well-positioned commentators…

“…the solution to this issue [Israeli-Palestinian conflict] has not been considered one of civil rights and civil liberties, as was the case in South Africa, as was the case here in the United States over the course of multi-decade, multi-century struggle for equality here. Rather the solution is interpreted to be one of separatism. The idea that the Palestinians will have their own state.

In reality that solution has only been a solution to the Zionist problem. The problem that the Zionists face is that they want the Palestinian geography without Palestinian demography. And so they find themselves in a position now where they occupy the West Bank, and they do not want to let go of the territory, but at the same time they do not want to give the Palestinians there the right to vote, and the right to citizenship, and so on.

And so separatism is seen as a solution to that Zionist problem but it’s no solution to the Palestinian’s problem that include rights to return to their homes, as well as self-determination, and the right to vote, the right to equality and dignity in their homeland, and so on. And so, that issue of separatism has acted really as a fig leaf to distract from an apartheid reality that is only becoming further, and further entrenched.” (Yusef Munayyer, Executive Director of the Palestine Center, responding to an interview question from Dennis J. Bernstein, host of “Flashpoints” on the Pacifica radio network)

The above exchange is the concluding excerpt from a longer article at Consortiumnews. Click here.

“Whatever this election was about, it wasn’t about making peace with the Palestinians, nor about Israel’s relations with Arab states in the region. It was about what Israelis wanted in their daily lives.” (Patrick Martin, The Globe & Mail, click here)

“WHAT IS the lesson of this election?

The right-religious bloc lost the election, but the “center-left” did not win it, because they could not put forward a credible candidate for prime minister, nor a credible alternative governing party with a solid, comprehensive blueprint for the solution of Israel’s basic problems.

To create such a new force, it is absolutely vital to integrate the Arab citizens in the political process as full-fledged partners. By keeping the Arabs out, the Left is castrating itself. A new Jewish-Arab left, a community of outlook, political language and interests, must be created – and this act of creation must start right now.

The battle for Israel is not lost. Israel’s “move to the right” has been blocked and is far from inevitable. We Israelis are not as crazy as we look.

This battle has ended in a draw. The next round can be won. It depends on us [the Israeli Left].” (Uri Avnery, founder of Gush Shalom, ‘peace bloc’) For the full article, click here. (For a bio about Uri Avnery, click here.)

 

 

 

Israeli government elections today – Watching with…

Compassion…      See this recent article (click here) by Israeli historian, Ilan Pappé (click here , here, and here).

Interest re: impact for the State of Palestine (click here and here)…

Empathy…     Who is allowed to vote? Who is not? (click here and here)

Concern…    About a shift to even-further right on the political spectrum in Israel (click here , here, and here); and  as seen from a Canadian perspective (click here and here)…                         Hope…

Click here and here for updates…Olive 'matriarch' tree - on a slope claimed by illegal Israeli settlers, looking over the old part of the city of Hebron, in the occupied West Bank - a place of great pain - 6 Feb. 2011 - Photo: Sherry Ann

Olive ‘matriarch’ tree – on a slope claimed by illegal Israeli settlers, looking over the old part of the city of Hebron, in the occupied West Bank – a place of great pain, yet also…hope – 6 Feb. 2011 – Photo: Sherry Ann

What news…of the ‘great turning’? Loving courage…

So much news that is encouraging… so much news that prompts us to keep up the effort…

“In countless localities, like green shoots pushing up through the rubble, new social and economic arrangements are sprouting. Not waiting for our national or state politicos to catch up with us, we are banding together, taking action in our own communities. Flowing from our creativity and collaboration on behalf of life, these actions may look marginal, but they hold the seeds for the future.” (from Joanna Macy’s webpage on which she describes the three dimensions of the Great Turning; click here)

What is the Great Turning? It is “…a name for the essential adventure of our time: the shift from the industrial growth society to a life-sustaining civilization.” (click here) This is about respect for life and nature, universal human rights, environmental, social, and economic justice, and a culture of peace…it’s about The Earth Charter (click here).

Here are links to the news that has drifted into my Inbox this week:

=Canadian-born, globally growing: Idle No More Movement (click here , here, and here)

=Speaking tour across Canada: Author and journalist Robert Fisk to talk on “Arab Spring”   (click here)

= “Palestinians Establish a new Village, Bab Alshams, in Area E1” (click here) (What is E1? click here)

= “O Little Town of Bethlehem” – a thought-provoking video (click here)

=Regarding the upcoming Israeli government elections (on 22 Jan. 2013): “Netanyahu government is Israel’s most anti-Zionist ever, says Amoz Oz” (click here)

As we all lean into new year’s resolutions and transitions, let’s share a sense of ‘loving courage’…a mix of the concept of ‘loving kindness’ (click here) with a desire to keep on ‘keeping on’…

in this new era, as we mark a new moon, here on this planet that we call home…

New moon over the Middle East - April 2009 - Photo Sherry Ann

New moon over the Middle East – April 2009 – Photo Sherry Ann

The human right to…dream of peace…

“Il faut que les femmes et les hommes de ce pays se redonneront le droit de rêver à un monde plus juste! (Women and men of this country must allow themselves the right to dream of a fairer world!)” – Françoise David, 2011 (cited in HERSTORY 2012, The Canadian Women’s Calendar, p. 104, Saskatoon Women’s Calendar Collective; here)

Françoise David is a social-justice activist. Do you remember, or know of, her in recent Canadian history? (Click here for more info.) One of the many dreams that she has realized in her life, thus far, was the 1995 March of Women Against Poverty – known in French as the “Du pain et des roses” march to a rally in Québec. The reference to “Bread and Roses” recalls the 1912 textile-workers strike in Lawrence, Massachusetts during which immigrant workers (many of them, women) called for fair wages and dignified working conditions (click here, here, and here). [Click here for an international news report titled, “The Cry for ‘Bread and Roses’ Continues”, regarding International Women’s Day (2012) and citing Palestinian women’s efforts at the Qalandiya Checkpoint area between Ramallah (in the occupied West Bank) and occupied East Jerusalem; see the 5-9-minute mark of the video.]

I regard Françoise David’s observation as a reminder that we, as Canadians, need to permit ourselves to realize our right to dream of a fairer world… At this turning of the year – from 2012 to 2013 – and as we begin a new era of world history (part of ‘the great turning’, click here), we look in our collective mirror and realize that we are losing touch with our dream of participating as ‘peaceful’ citizens in the global village…

Under the current federal government, Canada is growing increasingly militarized (listen to this interview here). And in this way, we begin to resemble ‘our best friend’ (here):  Israel.

“There is a saying in Israel, passed from one generation to the other: ‘Don’t worry, by the time he will be eighteen, He won’t have to go to the army. We will have peace by then.’ And then you have another war. -Eran Shakine 2009” (click here and here)

Eran Shakine. Julie M. Gallery.Toronto - Oct. 2009 - Photo: Sherry Ann

Eran Shakine. Julie M. Gallery.Toronto – Oct. 2009 – Photo: Sherry Ann

Israeli society is highly militarized; from kindergarten age, children are prepared for the mandatory draft into the Israeli Defense Force (IDF). New Profile (Movement for the Civil-ization of Israeli Society; click here) is a group that helps Israelis to see how they are being socialized toward militarism (e.g., in consumer ads) (click here). In the recent Israeli government’s attack on Gaza (November 2012), 75,000 reservists were ordered to report for duty; about 50,000 showed up.

Throughout Israel’s 65th year of existence (here), many people have sought refuge there with a dream of home. Yet, a proportion of Israelis have seen that dream dashed as they watch their government and army shift from one of defence to one of occupation. Of those Israelis, some have leaned into their right to dream anew, of peace. They have acted on that new dream by refusing to serve in the IDF. See these links for helpful overviews of the ‘refuser’ movement (here and here). A recent chapter of this dream has been led by high-school students in Israel. Starting in 2001, the Shministim (high school seniors) Israeli Youth Refusal Movement began, and continues, most recently with this young leader: “Natan Blanc, 19 years old from Haifa, arrived, Sunday, 22 Dec. 2012 , to the Induction Base in Tal-hashomer, where he again declared his refusal to serve in the Israeli Army. He was sentenced to 14 days of imprisonment for his refusal in the military prison No. 6 near Atlit.” (This is Natan’s third imprisonment; see more information and how to take action here. See additional articles here and here regarding other conscientious objectors in 2012.)

In early 2011, I had an opportunity to meet Sahar, a few times. She was the first woman in the 2008 group of Shministim to be imprisoned. Here is part of her story, as I recorded it. See this link for her own statement of refusal.

Sahar - West Jerusalem - 2 Feb. 2011 - Photo: Sherry Ann

Sahar – West Jerusalem – 2 Feb. 2011 – Photo: Sherry Ann

Sahar was born in August 1990. She was aware as a 12 or 13 year old of the movement against the occupation. Her father was an activist with the Second Intifada which started in 2000 (here). He took her tree planting (a peaceful form of activism; here) and she asked to go to more serious events. She was young. She did go to Bi’lin (a village in the occupied West Bank) for two years for the weekly demonstrations. She met those who refused to serve with the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) in 2005; she attended demonstrations supporting them.

In 1979, the first group of Shministim refused to serve in the occupied Palestinian territories (oPt). At that point in time, the term, Shministim, gained the connotation of refusenik. In 2001, Shministim was used as a term again. In 2001-2003, a few dozen Shministim were involved. A high-profile trial occurred. Five students went to jail for two years (the maximum sentence). That was the only time that a court martial of Shministim refusers has occurred. In all other cases, the IDF has used “administrative proceedings”; it’s a mechanism of the army.

Sahar was aware of the Shministim refuser movement prior to high school. She knew that she would be drafted in 2008 and began to organize with other students in 2007. They wrote to each other and others to raise awareness. One hundred people signed their Shministim letter.

In August 2008, ten people chose to go to prison. Sahar was one of the ten and was the first woman in her Shministim year to refuse IDF service. Her draft date was 25-26 August 2008. She was in prison for two months and in detention for three months.

Note: Orthodox-Jewish boys who study in Yeshiva for a minimum number of years are automatically exempt from IDF service. Palestinians who live in Israel are exempt. Religious Jewish women/girls are exempt although they have to submit a request for exemption.

Sahar described to me how a person may be exempted from IDF service:

1)      Secular Jewish society – 12% of potential draftees are exempted based on “mental health”. In the 11th and 12th grades, students undergo physical and IQ tests. Then, the army decides each student’s unit assignment. In the midst of this process (yet before being drafted), a student can ask to see a mental-health officer. For some units, meeting with a mental-health officer is automatically part of the process. Typically, the label that is given to some of the potential draftees is “depressed”. Given the pressure of the army with its strict system and then given the access to weapons, the army considers this a bad combination (i.e., increased risk of suicide). A primary task of the mental-health officer is to determine the suicide potential of draftees, because the army is responsible if a soldier commits suicide (i.e., an inquiry must occur). Yet, this route is “an easy backdoor” for young people. In effect, the majority of the 12% seeking exemption based on mental health are exempted.

2)      Conscientious Objection – The army has a Conscientious Objectors Committee (with a membership of 8-10 soldiers and one civilian). Pacifism is given as the reason for seeking exemption; applicants must convince the Committee that service in the army is amoral. Applicants will not receive exemption for political reasons.

3)      Incompatibility – Only the army may decide if a person is incompatible with the purpose of the army. A person cannot request this status. A person may be deemed incompatible for such reasons as a criminal record, drug use, dropping out of school, prior service in a military prison.

In 2008, 100 students signed the Shministim letter; only 10 went to prison. Probably, the others went the mental-health route. In effect, going to prison is a choice. Personally, Sahar didn’t want out on a mental-health reason. She did not want to lie about her beliefs. She chose to use the prison to raise awareness about the issues of the occupation. And at the same time, “we decided as a group that we have no reason to sit in prison forever.” “The normal process would be to show up on Draft Day (i.e., your 18th birthday) and indicate that you refuse the draft process and that you will not go. Then, on that same day, you go to trial with one officer; you are accused of refusing an order because you are a soldier as of that day. We were sentenced as soldiers. Usually, you would get between a week and a month; that depends on the officer in charge. [Sahar was initially given one week and then was released.] Then, you get a letter requesting that you return to base, because you are still a soldier. You go back and refuse again. They you try, again.” Sahar spent one week in prison, then one week in detention. Then she was AWOL [away without leave] for two weeks, at home. Then, she was in prison for three weeks. In total, she was in prison or detention for five months. She was exempted/released in January 2009.

As a group, the intention isn’t to fight the army and to sit in prison. The idea is to try and get out. All 10 of the refusers in 2008 hoped to get out on a charge of incompatibility because they perceived that as a path of integrity. Since 2005, none of the Shministim refusers have been released on incompatibility. Rather, they’ve been released on mental-health reasons. For Sahar, on her forth visit with the Mental-Health Officer, she was given a medical profile (i.e., “Profile 21”).

After being released, people live in three types of bubbles:

(1)   In Tel Aviv which is a secular Jewish city with the lowest enlistment rate.

(2)   Abroad (e.g., in Europe).

(3)   In an activist bubble – Sahar lives half-time in Jerusalem (which she describes as not very left-oriented, politically) and half-time in a developing town (where the Israeli government puts new immigrants; which she describes as being very far from left-oriented).

Sahar notes that, in Israeli society, individuals who refuse to serve in the IDF may continue to experience marginalization. For example, for a 20-year old upon release from the army, a typical question is not “How old are you?” but “What did you do in the army?” For 18-20 year old refusers, getting work can be hard due to huge social discrimination based on “We need workers after the army”. Legally, employers are not allowed to discriminate based on army service though job application forms may well ask about army service. For some refusers, getting a driver’s licence may be difficult due to their ‘mental-health’ refusal status.

What will Israeli society choose in the upcoming elections on 22 January 2013? Here are a few links to articles to help sort through the various players in these elections (here, here, here, here, and here). Recently, the Israeli Central Elections Committee tried to disqualify MK (Member of the Knesset) Hanin Zuabi’s candidacy for the 19th Knesset; she is the only Palestinian woman member of the Knesset and participated in the Freedom Flotilla to Gaza in 2011. Concern exists that this was an attempt to silence the minority Palestinian voice within the state of Israel (i.e., Palestinians with Israeli citizenship, though it is a marginalized, second-class status; they live in Israel, not in the occupied territories). On 30 Dec. 2012, the Israeli Supreme Court declared that MK Zuabi would be permitted to participate in the upcoming elections (here and here); this is a hopeful sign.

As Canadians, we have some obligation to follow these elections given that the Canadian federal government is so closely tied to the current Israeli government (see an article here). How will we respond to this ‘best friend’ (here)? How might we be conscientious observers?

We have a right…to dream… To dream and act conscientiously. See this video (here) for an instance of young Israelis daring to dream, and act in support, of a fairer world – to end the Israeli government’s occupation of Palestine; Sahar appears at the 2-minute mark of the video. By dreaming, we imagine the possibilities…

Listen – can you hear voices singing the words of the poem and song, “Bread and Roses”… “Hearts starve as well as bodies – give us bread and give us roses…” (here, here – Mimi Fariña wrote the song, and here ).

Let’s dream of, and thereby, realize a peaceful and beautiful world…at home and globally… in 2013…

Human Rights Day – 10 Dec. 2012 – Stand up today…

Today is the international day for Human Rights (click here). How will you mark this day? Yes, you, as a global citizen, possibly, too, as a Canadian citizen. An individual who has Canadian citizenship. You have a voice, distinct from the Canadian government. How will you use your voice?

On 29 Nov. 2012, the federal government of Canada chose, in effect, not to support human rights when it voted against a resolution in the United Nations’ General Assembly for the promotion of Palestine to a non-member, “enhanced observer” status at the UN. Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME) describes that the Israeli government lobbied “…European governments, [and] the majority of these governments voted in favour, including heavyweights France, Norway and Spain, as well as Austria, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Sweden, Portugal, and Switzerland. The resolution passed by a wide majority, with 138 of the UN’s 193 UN members voting in favour, 9 opposed (including Israel, the US, Canada) and 41 abstentions.” (see the full CJPME statement here)

On 13 April 2011, leading up to the most recent Canadian, federal election, I posted the following on my blog:  “In voting against resolutions of the United Nations Human Rights Council condemning Israel’s violations of Palestinian human rights, Canada has also failed to live up to its obligations to uphold respect for international human rights and humanitarian law.” (Federal Election Kit, 2011, The United Church of Canada, p. 20)

After the UN vote on 29 Nov. 2012, the Israeli government declared it would build 3,000 new housing units in occupied East Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank (click here). As reported in Haaretz on  30  Nov. 2012 by Barak Ravid (here), “… According to the [senior diplomatic] source, Israel also plans to advance long-frozen plans for the E1 area, which covers an area that links the city of Jerusalem with the settlement of Ma’aleh Adumim. If built, the controversial plan would prevent territorial contiguity between the northern and southern West Bank, making it difficult for a future Palestinian state to function. In the beginning of his term, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gave the Obama administration a commitment that Israel would not build in the area. Both of his predecessors, Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert, also promised the U.S. administration that Israel would not build in E1.” For a description of the significance of the E1 area, click here.

On 13 April 2011, I also wrote the following: “Israel occupied East Jerusalem along with the West Bank in 1967. Occupation is regarded internationally as a temporary situation. Permanent changes in occupied territory are not allowed except for military necessity or to benefit the local population (Article 43, Hague Regulations). Destruction of property is not allowed (Article 53, Fourth Geneva Convention). Confiscation of property (Article 46, Hague Regulations) is not allowed. The forced displacement and inhumane treatment (e.g., denying essentials like water) of the local population is…not allowed.

However, Israel began its self-declared, illegal annexation in 1967. Using force, it expanded the municipal boundaries of East Jerusalem by annexing 28% of West Bank. The Israeli government has been moving its citizens into occupied East Jerusalem. This is population transfer and is a war crime [Article 49(6), Fourth Geneva Convention]. The Israeli government’s construction of the Separation Barrier (Wall) to the east of the internationally recognized Green Line (i.e., the 1949 Armistice line following the declaration of the state of Israel) is also illegal (International Court of Justice, 2004; click here, p. 3). Finally, house and infrastructure demolitions  are a war crime because they are a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions (click here and here).” (see my full posting here)

As reported today by Vicky Tobianah in Haaretz, ““This [Canadian] government has essentially walked away from the UN,” says [Alistair] Edgar [a political science professor at Wilfred Laurier University in Ontario, Canada and executive director of the Academic Council on the United Nations System]. “We have withdrawn from UN peacekeeping, turned down requests to engage in new peacekeeping operations, we are cutting our funding to overseas development and narrowing the number of countries we give money to.”” (click here)

With each passing day, the current Canadian government is revealing its stance. What will your stance be?

Check out these opportunities for action:

CJPME’s action alert (here)

US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation – Marking Human Rights Day (here)

Commentary from Ada Glustein from Building Bridges Vancouver, a non-partisan, non-sectarian organization which aims to provide a forum for dialogue and information concerning the long-standing conflict in Israel-Palestine (here)

Media release, Independent Jewish Voices Canada (click here)

Media release, Amnesty International (click here)

Commentary from Hanan Ashrawi – on the side of international law (here)

A non-violent approach? How dare you!

Yesterday (click here), the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), led by Mahmoud Abbas (Chairman of the PLO and President of the Palestinian Authority), submitted a resolution to the United Nations’ General Assembly for the promotion of Palestine to a non-member, “enhanced observer” status at the UN. A decision is expected on Thursday, 29 Nov. 2012. You may remember that, in Fall 2011, the Palestinian Authority applied for full-member status (based on pre-June 1967 borders) with the UN. In Nov. 2011, the Security Council (under pressure from such players as the United States) did not achieve a unanimous response (click here and here) and the process stalled.

As you will see in my links to various news articles, some analysts are commending this current application as a non-violent action in response to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Why, then, would Canada be pressuring the Palestinian Authority to stop this application (click here), with a threat to end funding aid?? Essentially: stop this non-violent action, or else! (click here) Since when did and how has this become a Canadian position?? (Consider this resource by Marci McDonald for additional background.)

Note: Palestine does not have independent statehood in international-relations terms. Palestinians are stateless. With their current “permanent observer” status, Palestinians cannot access the International Criminal Court (ICC). With “enhanced observer” status, Palestinians would be able to apply for access to the ICC. Israel and the United States have actively worked to prevent Palestinian access to the ICC (click here , here, and here). Imagine if such access existed… why, this would be another non-violent response to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict…a way into examining the Israeli government’s violations of international humanitarian law (see an excellent analysis here). Imagine…

“Indeed, as the latest Gaza conflict begins its inevitable winding down, it will become increasingly apparent that Israel’s continual deployment of large-scale, indiscriminate force against people and space of Gaza – and, equally important, the West Bank as well – constitute not merely the context for war crimes but for crimes against humanity and, because of their clearly aggressive nature, a crime against peace. Hamas and Palestinian forces responsible for launching rockets at Israel will also have to reckon with the legal, political and moral consequences of their ongoing resort to violence, and the massive and disproportionate Israeli response they invariably produce.” (Mark LeVine & Lisa Hajjar, 21 Nov. 2012; see the full article here.)

Actions: From Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (here)

Please take 30 seconds to show solidarity with the Palestinians before UN General Assembly vote

Thursday, Nov. 29th, the Palestinians will take their bid for statehood to the UN General Assembly, after it was blocked last year by the US in the Security Council.  It will likely pass, and if it does, the Palestinians will have important new tools to use in pursuit of their self-determination and human rights.  A few important states* are wavering, and you can make a difference.

First, click here to send an email to your MP expressing your support for Palestine’s bid.  Then forward this email to a friend.
Then please join in and do your part in one or more of the following ways:

1. If you did not do so above, participate in our action alert to Canadian political leaders. Click here to send your email now.

2. Send a hard-copy letter to your MP. Please click here to open a letter in an editable PDF format to send to your Member of Parliament. Click here to find out who’s your MP.

3. Participate in Avaaz’s action alert to the leaders of European nations.  Strong support from Europe will be important in Palestine’s quest.  Click here to watch an excellent video prepared by Avaaz on the Palestine issue, called “Middle East Peace – The real story”. Then click here to send your email.
4. Meet your MP. Walk them through our FAQ document on Palestinian statehood as well as our talking points. To find the contact information for your MP, please click here.

5.Sign up to CJPME’s Media Centre, and participate in our media alert network. We are closely monitoring the media during this period, and additional participants can help out greatly. Click here to watch an overview video. Click here to sign up as a media responder.

Together, let’s make Canada the champion of human rights that it should be.  Thanks for your support to the rights of the Palestinian people!
The CJPME Leadership
CJPME Email – CJPME Website

* Unfortunately, Canada is poised to oppose the Palestinian bid at the UN.”

The conflict lives here, not just ‘over there’…

Why should Canadians care about the 60+ years of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Why should we concern ourselves with what happened ‘over there’ during the past week and a half? Why should we be interested in the permit system that the Israeli government has imposed on people living in the occupied Palestinian territories? It’s not as though we’ve had a ‘say’ in it… that Canada’s colonial pass-and-permit system imposed on Aboriginal peoples in the late 19th-early 20th century served as a point of reference for the South-African apartheid system or that in turn, the South-African apartheid system served as a point of reference for the Israeli permit system that restricts freedom of movement and is separating two societies [in other words: apartheid, which means apart-ness (here), separation (here); also, here]. It’s not as though we’re living with the effects of apartheid right now in a society that ignores what the United Nations declares as unacceptable (e.g., food insecurity among Aboriginal peoples, here). Actually, I perceive that we are living with effects of apartheid;  the socio-structural impact is horrific regarding living standards among many First Nations, Métis, and Inuit peoples on Turtle Island…

It’s not as if the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is simply ‘over there’… We just need to open our eyes and ears to see and hear the voices of Canadian-Israelis (e.g., Lisa Goldman, click here) and Canadian-Palestinians (e.g., Rafeef Ziadah, click here) who are seeking an end to the Israeli government’s occupation of Palestine… To help clarify understanding about the nature of the conflict, see these 10 myths as identified by Israeli historian, Ilan Pappe (here and here)…

Didn’t a Canadian (Marshall McLuhan – born in Edmonton, Alberta) anticipate how we would all become a global village (here)? We are all part of this conflict… let’s start responding and taking action whenever and wherever we can…

Action: Please share this posting and the links to the thoughtful voices that are out there…share this with family, friends, on Facebook, Twitter…

On the edge of what? How might Canada help rather than hinder peace…

Is the ceasefire holding? Some say that it is (click here), despite at least two shooting incidents (here). Much discussion is underway regarding: (a) who has benefited from this recent aggression (here) and (b) the longevity of this ceasefire and the persistence of non-violent resistance to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (here and here; this interview is part of Harry Fear’s coverage from Gaza).

What saddens me is what appears to be happening now that the world media is turning the public’s attention to other news items. The Israeli government continues with indirect structural violence in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem and a new wave of arrests and administrative detentions of Palestinians – without charge or trial (click here).

Today, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME) shared this report (here) from Steve Hibbard (Nov. 2012) regarding the shift in Canada’s Middle East Policy during Prime Minister Harper’s leadership. Hibbard sees the potential for Canada to contribute in this ambiguous moment: “Perhaps the most helpful step Canada could take would be to use its close ties with Israel to work with Israelis and Palestinians to build mutual trust. Mutual trust is one of the requirements for an Israeli-Palestinian settlement which in turn is the key to a broader Middle-East peace.” (p. 13)

CJPME released this statement (here) that asks Canadian Members of Parliament (MP) to end a silence that many of them have held…for too long. Please write to your MP.

Click here for a list of gatherings near you in the coming days.  If you are in Edmonton, note this opportunity: A film screening and panel discussion on Wed., 28 Nov. 2012 regarding “What Comes Next for Gaza?” (click here)

Ceasefire – cease fire – now, breathe…

Breath…that’s what we share…

A ceasefire between the Israeli government and Hamas has been announced. See the full text here and a Reuters article here.

Too many people have died. Too many people are wounded. Too many people are full of fear…

Now, let’s breathe…together…focus on that – only on the breath

to carry this ceasefire into the next breath, and into the next…

I invite you to pause to watch this video (here) for five minutes…breathe…and listen to Rumi’s “Only Breath” poem from 900 years ago…

Breathe…

A different type of resistance…through relationships

Imagine a different type of resistance – moving away from competition toward a shared effort of planning together for a shared future… Other Voice (here) is doing just that. Click here for their petition (or if you do not have a Facebook account, click here). In early 2011, I met Roni Keidar, a member of Other Voice who lives near the Gaza border.  I also met Eric Yellin, a member of Other Voice, and the originator of the petition. See their photo at this posting (here).

Amira Hass describes well the difference between two types of resistance in the following article. She is a journalist with Ha’aretz (click here). She is a Jewish Israeli who has lived in the occupied Palestinian territories. (Click here for links to additional articles by Amira Hass.)

Israel’s right to self-defence a tremendous propaganda victory

By Amira Hass  | Nov.19, 2012 

One of Israel’s tremendous propaganda victories is that it has been accepted as a victim of the Palestinians, both in the view of the Israeli public and that of Western leaders who hasten to speak of Israel’s right to defend itself. The propaganda is so effective that only the Palestinian rockets at the south of Israel, and now at Tel Aviv, are counted in the round of hostilities. The rockets, or damage to the holiest of holies – a military jeep – are always seen as a starting point, and together with the terrifying siren, as if taken from a World War II movie, build the meta-narrative of the victim entitled to defend itself.
 
Every day, indeed every moment, this meta-narrative allows Israel to add another link to the chain of dispossession of a nation as old as the state itself, while at the same time managing to hide the fact that one continuous thread runs from the 1948 refusal to allow Palestinian refugees to return to their homes, the early 1950s expulsion of Bedouin from the Negev desert, the current expulsion of Bedouin from the Jordan Valley, ranches for Jews in the Negev, discrimination in budgets in Israel, and shooting at Gazan fishermen to keep them from earning a respectable living. Millions of such continuous threads link 1948 to the present. They are the fabric of life for the Palestinian nation, as divided as it may be in isolated pockets. They are the fabric of life of Palestinian citizens of Israel and of those who live in their lands of exile.
 
But these threads are not the entire fabric of life. The resistance to the threads that we, the Israelis, endlessly spin is also part of the fabric of life for Palestinians. The word resistance has been debased to mean the very masculine competition of whose missile will explode furthest away (a competition among Palestinian organizations, and between them and the established Israeli army ). It does not invalidate the fact that, in essence, resistance to the injustice inherent in Israeli domination is an inseparable part of life for each and every Palestinian.
 
The foreign and international development ministries in the West and in the United States knowingly collaborate with the mendacious representation of Israel as victim, if only because every week they receive reports from their representatives in the West Bank and Gaza Strip about yet another link of dispossession and oppression that Israel has added to the chain, or because their own taxpayers’ money make up for some of the humanitarian disasters, large and small, inflicted by Israel.
 
On November 8, two days before the attack on the holiest of holies – soldiers in a military jeep – they could have read about IDF soldiers killing 13-year old Ahmad Abu Daqqa, who was playing soccer with his friends in the village of Abassan, east of Khan Yunis. The soldiers were 1.5 kilometers from the kids, inside the Gaza Strip area, busy with “exposing” (a whitewashed word for destroying ) agricultural land. So why shouldn’t the count of aggression start with a child? On November 10, after the attack on the jeep, the IDF killed another four civilians, aged 16 to 19.
 
Wallowing in ignorance
 
Leaders of the West could have known that, before the IDF’s exercise last week in the Jordan Valley, dozens of Bedouin families were told to evacuate their homes. How extraordinary that IDF training always occurs where Bedouin live, not Israeli settlers, and that it constitutes a reason to expel them. Another reason. Another expulsion. The leaders of the West could also have known, based on the full-color, chrome-paper reports their countries finance, that since the beginning of 2012, Israel has destroyed 569 Palestinian buildings and structures, including wells and 178 residences. In all, 1,014 people were affected by those demolitions.
 
We haven’t heard masses of Tel Aviv and southern residents warning the stewards of the state about the ramifications of this destruction on the civilian population. The Israelis cheerfully wallow in their ignorance. This information and other similar facts are available and accessible to anyone who’s really interested. But Israelis choose not to know. This willed ignorance is a foundation stone in the building of Israel’s sense of victimization. But ignorance is ignorance: The fact that Israelis don’t want to know what they are doing as an occupying power doesn’t negate their deeds or Palestinian resistance.
 
In 1993, the Palestinians gave Israel a gift, a golden opportunity to cut the threads tying 1948 to the present, to abandon the country’s characteristics of colonial dispossession, and together plan a different future for the two peoples in the region. The Palestinian generation that accepted the Oslo Accords (full of traps laid by smart Israeli lawyers ) is the generation that got to know a multifaceted, even normal, Israeli society because the 1967 occupation allowed it (for the purpose of supplying cheap labor ) almost full freedom of movement. The Palestinians agreed to a settlement based on their minimum demands. One of the pillars of these minimum demands was treating the Gaza Strip and West Bank as a single territorial entity.
 
But once the implementation of Oslo started, Israel systematically did everything it could to make the Gaza Strip into a separate, disconnected entity, as part of Israel’s insistence on maintaining the threads of 1948 and extending them. Since the rise of Hamas, it has done everything to back up the impression Hamas prefers – that the Gaza Strip is a separate political entity where there is no occupation. If that is so, why not look at things as follows: As a separate political entity, any incursion into Gazan territory is an infringement of its sovereignty, and Israel does this all the time. Does the government of the state of Gaza not have the right to respond, to deter, or at least the masculine right – a twin of the IDF’s masculine right – to scare the Israelis just as Israel scares the Palestinians?
 
But Gaza is not a state. Gaza is under Israeli occupation, despite all the verbal acrobatics of both Hamas and Israel. The Palestinians who live there are part of a people whose DNA contains resistance to oppression.
 
In the West Bank, Palestinian activists try to develop a type of resistance different from the masculine, armed resistance. But the IDF puts down all popular resistance with zeal and resolve. We haven’t heard of residents of Tel Aviv and the south complaining about the balance of deterrence the IDF is building against the civilian Palestinian population.
 
And so Israel again provides reasons for more young Palestinians, for whom Israel is an abnormal society of army and settlers, to conclude that the only rational resistance is spilled blood and counter-terrorizing. And so every Israeli link of oppression and all Israeli disregard of the oppression’s existence drags us further down the slope of masculine competition.”